Friday, August 3, 2012
MAKING THINKING VISIBLE
Chapter 1: Unpacking Thinking
In this chapter, Ron Ritchhart explores mental activity of ourselves and our students and how we as teachers can make thinking visible in our classrooms. He touches on Bloom's Taxonomy, which classifies educational objectives into three domains: affective, cognitive, and psychomotor. Bloom also identified a sequence of six learning ojbectives that moved from lower-order to higher-order thinking: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis synthesis and evaluation. According to Bloom, each category precedes the next. However, Ritchhart argues that this is not the case because thinking is much more complex than this and that
these skills are more fluid and interchangeable.
Ritchhart also unpacks Bloom's framing of "understanding." Ritchhart points to the distinction that researchers have made between surface learning, which focuses on rote memorization of facts, and deep learning, which develops understanding through active and constructive processes. The main point here is that thinking is not a sequential process but rather a complex and dynamic procedure.
Ritchhart provides a researcher J.B. Biggs who stated that, "To be properly metacognitive, then, students have to realistically aware of their own cognitive resources in relation to the task demands, and then to plan, monitor, and control those resources (15). Basically, students need to be strategically aware of their own thinking in order to be getting the most effective type of thinking done. As teachers, we want students to become more independent thinkers.
Questions:
1. How do we help students become more aware of their own thinking?
2. How do we create a classroom where everyone can become a more engaged and independent thinker?
3. What do you think about thinking?
Chapter 2: Putting Thinking at the Center of the Educational Enterprise
The next chapter continues with the importance of creating opportunities for thinking and making our students' thinking visible. A line that really stuck oiut for me here was that we should continually expose our students thinking by "pushing it forward through discrepant and unexpected events." I think this is a really important way of trying to create memorable lessons and trying to avoid the same kind of teaching methods in our classrooms. Although these kinds of unexpected events might not always be possible because of other restrictions and demands within the school setting, I think it is incredibly valuable to teach students by creating unexpected lesson plans.
Another point of emphasis in this chapter was that we need to be models as teachers for our students to learn from. Ritchhart states that "the students in our charge need to see an image of us as thinkers and learners that they can imitate and learn from." (29) Students need to see how we challenge ourselves in our thinking so that they can advance their understandings as well.
Ritchhart lists 6 ways that we can making thinking visible for students. First, he points to asking good, open-ended questions that push towards deeper understanding. Along these same lines we should also ask authentic questions of our students that show that we are simultaneously involved in the act of thinking and questioning in the classroom. In this way, we model an interest in ideas for our students. We show that we too are interested in learning from their questions and observations. He also points to constructing understanding by asking guiding and direct questions to leader students toward understanding of important ideas. This is a matter of asking well-worded questions and following up by building upon students' previous knowledge and answers. The next step in this is facilitating and clarifying thinking. The author explains how the question "What makes you say that?" is powerful in advancing thinking and conveys, in a simple way, how we are genuinely interested about our students' thinking. Another simple way of making thinking visible is by listening attentively for our students' answers and showing respect for each learner's contributions by really responding to what they have provided to the class. Finally, another tool is the use of documentation which helps students and teachers observe the learning process through things like whiteboards, photographs, notes, blogs, drawings, etc.
Questions:
1. How do we create "discrepant and unexpected events" while at the same time fulfilling state standards and other requirements like preparing for testing?
2. Are there other ways to make thinking visible besides the ones that were pointed out in the chapter?
Chapter 3: Introduction to Thinking Routines
The next chapter introduces the idea of thinking routines which are helpful ways of managing and facilitating classroom goals successfully. These routines work as tools, structures, and patterns of behavior. These routines help both students and teaches in the classroom. Routines can be things like bellringers at the beginning of class (a question on the board to get students thinking for the first five minutes of class) or a way in which quizzes get handed in at the end of class. Ritchhart states that "all instruction takes place within a context, and routines contribute to the establishment of that context through the creation of socially shared, scripted clices of behavior." (48) Classrooms should be a a microcosm of a civilized society and societies need certain ways of getting things accomplished. This doesn't mean that the classroom should just turn into a series of mundane patterns of behavior but routines help organize the class into an engaging, organized structure.
Questions:
1. What kind of thinking routines do you envision for your classroom?
2. Were there any routines from school that were more annoying than useful?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I think this book is really important to our generation(s). We grew up in a time when worksheets ruled the classroom and all we had to do was "fill in the blank" (or at least most of my school experience was like that). Since we were taught that way, it's hard to imagine a classroom with hands-on activities and engaged children. But this is the way it should be. How can students think critically when all they have to do is find the word in their textbook and then copy it down on a piece of paper? Not much thought is required at all. Is that the type of people we want to have? Zombies who can copy really well?
ReplyDeleteI think it's extremely important to teach students that they are thinking and learning. Even with the younger ones, you don't have to trick them into learning, you can flat out tell them..."Hey, we're learning." And if you can make learning fun, they'll associate fun and learning together. One thing that I do not do yet, but want to do with my students is that every day they have to tell me one thing they learned before they leave. It's really a good transition to let them get their things to get ready to go home...once they tell me something they learned, they can get their things. This forces them to THINK and reflect on their day. Then, when they go home and their parents ask what they learned at school today, they can say something other than "nothing" or "I donno."
Routines and structure are absolutely essential to a classroom, especially if you are working with young children or students from families that lack structure. The days when we have a visitor or a party or anything that messes up our original schedule...watch out. The kids go CRAZY. You wouldn't think that flashing the lights for clean up time or always doing small groups after the kids get back from gym are that important, but they are. And you'll see it the first time your schedule changes. It is so important to them, knowing what comes next. It gives them a sense of control, I think. Even as adults we like to know our agendas, what's coming next. Routines are just a nice way to organize your classroom, and hey- they can be fun!
David, you posed really great questions to the group.
ReplyDeleteIn regards question 1 and making students more aware of their own thinking, I think one of the best ways is to use blooms taxonomy as a scaffold and begin with more basic mental activities and progress to higher order thinking activities. Much of my high school experience seemed to be focused on rote memory activities only and studies show this has little impact on internalizing information and long-term retention. By incorporating more critical thinking activities that challenge students to design, create, build, invent, or plan their own educational path can we hope to develop deeper thinking. Since students are at different abilities levels, as teachers we can scaffold our lessons or group students by ability to allow stronger students to help strengthen students who need additional help.
What do I think about thinking? What do you think about my thinking? I think that the Socratic method of questioning is an awesome way to encourage students to think for themselves and learn to rely on their own ideas before seeking confirmation.
I think my favorite part about Chapter 2 was the need to ask students open-ended answers and the use of teacher modeling in the thought process. Do we really need to create discrepant and unexpected events? Or do these occur on their own?
Routines I plan on using is bell-ringers, discussing what the week looks like, and holding regular review sessions.
A lot of what was discussed in the these introductory chapters of Making Thinking Visible was not all that new to me but I was surprised to see Bloom's taxonomy called out in such a way. The reason for this is that throughout my experience at DePaul I have heard nothing but good things about Bloom's method so it's weird to have that suddenly thrown in my face. With that being said I'm not about to give up on it all together. I agree with Ritchart that thinking is much more complicated than a six step process but I think for planning purposes the taxonomy is quite useful. While ideally it would be nice to discuss nothing but complex issues with our students all day in class the reality is that these do not just happen as a matter of fact. In many cases I think students need to be helped and prodded along to a point where they feel comfortable or able to discuss a foreign subject in detail. I think Bloom's helps teachers build up this whole process so by the end of your unit or lesson your students will be willing and ready to consider issues critically.
ReplyDeleteI think this can be directly tied into the idea of establishing routine in a classroom since students could end up looking forward to and relying on this method. However, and perhaps this is what Ritchhart was getting at, we don't want our students to always have to depend on their teachers to scaffold their learning and understanding experiences. Perhaps this is what makes metacognition such an important part of the learning process. It allows you to understand what you already know and apply that to your own way of thinking, which in turn allows you to refine how you go about understanding things.
David, I enjoyed your synapsis of the chapters and found myself agreeing with a lot of Ritchhart's thoughts and ideas. When you asked the question "How do we help students become more aware of their own thinking?", I felt that similar to what Anna said, we need to teach our students that they are thinking and being critical. If they don't understand the learning and thinking processes that are occuring, we lose half the value or what is being taught/discussed. I agree with Ritchhart about the many ways we can make thinking visible; asking open ended questions, modeling interest in the subject, etc, because the more engaged our students are, and the more they see how deep of answers we want from them, the more involved they'll become.
ReplyDeleteYou also asked, " How do we create a classroom where everyone can become a more engaged and independent thinker?". I believe that this can be done through catering to a wide variety of students interests and learning styles. Not all students will be able to grasp the concept of thinking critically from the get go, but when we employ various strategies and tactics, a great deal of our students will be successful. I think it's important to practice thinking critically across all content areas. We also need to be patient with students who do not grasp content so quickly, and give them room to grow, learn, and speak up when they feel comfortable.
Your post brings up some really good questions, some of which I had to go back and really think about. Everyone has brought up some really good points in the response posts as well, lots of thinking about thinking here.
ReplyDeleteYou asked "How do we help students become more aware of their own thinking?"
In a way scaffolding helps with this as it enables students to see the steps to get to a conclusion, but the real way they become away of their own thinking is through the gradual release of responsibility. At that point as you the teacher begin to start taking the support away piece by piece the student will realize that those are the parts they now need to fill in with their own cognition. I think this is a good method when dealing with complex processes especially in the first part of the year, as the student gains all the responsibility, then more creativity of thought and open discussion can take place, a more teacher-student/student-teacher atmosphere.
Ritchhart wants us to demonstrate to students that we are thinkers and learners as well, what better way then through working towards a atmosphere where the students learn from the teacher and each-other and the teacher learns from the students and their experiences. "Paulo Freire your my hero" (Say it in the Cameron voice from Ferris Bueller)
2. How do we create a classroom where everyone can become a more engaged and independent thinker?
Anna has got a great idea with using Socratic Questioning, I love the use of Socratic seminars and love even more a method I learned in Hilary Conklins class where there are two circles; the inner is the discussion circle with the teacher occasionally asking questions to keep the discussion going, the outer are observers, each with their own specific part of the discussion to observe and report on. This not only allows for smaller discussions (the class is split) but as the students in the inner circle get caught up in the discussion they may lose sight of good points brought up and passed over, the fact that some people talk more than others, a reoccurring issue that has been brought up a certain number of times etc.
David, your post brought up something interesting ideas and questions that educators often feels the need to get clarification on. Bloom’s taxonomy has always been useful to me throughout my teaching career, so Ritchart analysis might be something for educators to pander. But the notion that thinking is much more than a six step process is worth considering from a critical pedagogical perspective in relation to best teaching practices that will empower our students. Ritchart’s argument about how we can make thinking visible for our students is very important; in some cases this visible thinking is seem only applicable to early elementary grades in relation shapes and words association. It is critical for educators to motivate their students to be independent thinkers but to do so, teachers will need to revamp their teaching strategies and make them more students friendly.
ReplyDeleteQuestioning, modeling of subject matter and relating content to real life experiences of students is a great way to engage students in critical thinking. I think Ritchart’s six steps process is a good way to re-engage our students to be active participants in their education.
1. How do we help students become more aware of their own thinking?
ReplyDeleteI loved when we wrote those journal entries in class and shared them - that is something I want to do weekly in my classroom. Luckily I am studying English so I can keep it relevant, but I think it is beneficial for any subject. Like Robert said, relating content to real life experiences is an awesome way to get kids thinking - maybe when I do weekly journals in my class, that will be the question they need to answer - what can you relate what we worked on in class this week, to your life outside the classroom?
As for the discrepant and unexpected events, YES. The things I remember most from junior high or high school were those lessons that were different, or presentations/projects/etc that I worked on that were outside the box. Those events are vital and I think they can be done in addition to completing the core standards.
David, nice reflective questions on these chapters to help us generate ideas.
ReplyDeleteThinking about...
Rituals in thinking activities: thinking about how and when we do regularized thinking processes, so that students learn the process like the back of their hand. Then at some point they can take the lead on the thinking process. To give an example from my own classes, three days a week we do "Open Minds" journal entries.
1) Put a prompt on the board, that has two oppositional positions related to a topic we will explore or are exploring a the time.
2) On a template form students write: their own position in a sentence, the oppositions' position statement and TWO reasons that may be given, and THREE reasons for why your position chosen is better.
3) Seven minutes to do the entry, five minutes for reflection, and I (the teacher) tracks main ideas and who said what. Students who speak first get extra credit, but can only earn that once a week so everyone is required to speak.
4) NEXT STEP: After students have become comfortable with this routine, I ask a student to lead the Open Minds discussion for the class. I also then p[review three main ideas coming, and ask students to crete their own oppositional positions.
I use this an example to illustrate: structure and regularity of activity, modeling the activity and thinking process, a system to ensure all students participate, then asking students to lead the process which empowers students as leaders, and pulling on topics chosen by students--these last two give ownership of the discussion to the students.
Thinking about: the time it requires to create such systems. Anyone who has done inquiry based science experiments, literature circles, peer jury, etc. realizes that routine isn;t done and learned in a day. I have often heard teachers say that it takes about three weeks to build a routine into the classroom, requiring modeling, repeated student reflection and meta-cogniton by observing the practice in action, and then stepping back so that students are self-sufficient in coordinating that activity themselves.
Recognition of the social structure of the overall learning environment: I have learned (painfully) that in a learn and regurgitate environment with heavy disciplinary norms, students have to LEARN Socratic discussion and how to do it. Kids that have been in heavily socially controlled environments sometimes have to be nurtured toward freedom. In uniform schools, with detention or demerit heavy oversight, students may be used to following directions rather than engaging in activities. We have to be ready to work through it ourselves and for and with our students. It may require creating new norms within frameworks and then branching out from there.
Lastly, DOCUMENTATION:
Kids love, feed off of, and learn from seeing joyous documentation of the work they have done or accomplished. Taking pictures of your class at work is awesome, if we can find time to share them with students later. I learned from one dynamic teacher who used documentation to help students review HOW they learned during a unit. He would take many pictures, create a cool slide show, and spend half a period at the end of the unit showing back what students did, asking them to describe what was happening in the pictures. With music and food involved, this can become a celebratory reflection routine for the class!
It gets even better when students get to create the slideshows, choose the music, and bring the snacks...more belongs to them!
Creating a classroom--what type of work stations and thinking stations can we have in our classroom?
ReplyDeleteThe metacognitive approach (thinking about thinking) is a great way to steer kids away from the robotic, "zombie-like" (a reference to Julie's response) regurgitations of answers in class. It encourages kids to reflect rather than memorize, and in the long run will instill the concept that problems and solutions are not black and white but rather approach an infinite realm of possibilities.
ReplyDeleteMost university settings (at least the good ones) are based off of similar levels of critical thinking and metacognition when students discuss material with their professors. In light of this, shouldn't we be preparing students for college by planting the first seed of self-reflection rather than jamming standardized tests down our students' throats? I found I had to completely adjust my way of thinking when I reached my undergrad, and 100% in a good way! In terms of cognition, this is not the way it should be. Middle schools and high schools should be more aligned with colleges when critical thinking is concerned.
In order to help students become more aware of how they think, I really enjoy using concept maps. If you use them in an open ended way, starting with a central idea and moving out from there, students can see how a general idea or question can become more detailed and specific. They can then see how one question leads to another.
ReplyDeleteI too think that Socratic questioning needs to be injected into every activity, where it fits in. Students who are allowed to simply state an answer and not think it through are not given a chance to really *think* about their answer and come up with reasons to defend it. However, it is important to utilize all aspects of Socratic questioning because only asking one level (such as asking, "Why do you say that?") over and over, will become repetitive, boring, and easily evaded by the students. You must change up the types of questions you're asking, the ways in which you are asking, and the activities during which you are asking them.
- Cari
How do we create a classroom where everyone can become a more engaged and independent thinker? In answering this question, I think that this can be done, not necessarily for all students at the same time, but with continued implementation of vibrant, rich lessons and integration of routines that encourage deeper thinking enhanced engagement and independent thinking abilities are something that can happen for each student at some point within classrooms. I think that it is something that teachers should strive for their students to achieve regardless of how much time and energy that it may take. In the long run these types of ideals are what will aid our students in successfully moving on to the next level. The learning of patterns of behaviors through thinking routines could provide for increased understanding of material by students which may aid in moving them toward the right direction of thinking independently.
ReplyDelete